Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: Vanity Fair's 19th Annual Hollywood Issue

  1. #41
    Senior Member jeanne_dielman's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: In my head
    Posts: 1,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Aldo View Post
    There's something wrong with Cooper's hair.
    He's doing it for that new David O. Russell movie.

  2. #42
    Senior Member AnaFaria's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 1,619
    Quote Originally Posted by Cecilia View Post
    I always buy the Hollywood issue, but I'm not buying this one. It looks absolutely horrid. The photos are ugly and actors look awkward. In addition, this is such a random collection of people that half their intended people must have cancelled and they were looking for free people at the last minute. Bradley and Ben make sense but Emma hasn't had anything relevant since the Help 18 months ago. Plus she has been on cover of Hollywood issue before. Eddie is a rising name and fits. Why is Halle there again? Is that some old unused photo they decided to slip into the issue due to budget cuts? Little Q looks cute, should have been on the cover (albeit the setting would have had to be different...) Olivia Wilde was been there before, I believe and still isn't anymore relevant than 2 years ago. Does her agent have compromising photos of VF editor or what? Bella and Jonah would have made much more sense year ago than now.

    As someone mentioned before, the best part of Hollywood issue is when you get the young rising stars and you can look at the cover couple of years later and see who made it. The order in which they are positioned (cover, slip 1, slip 2) is also interesting record of what they relative stardom rankings were at the time. Besides, it's always fun to speculate in advance who's going to make it since they always include a collection of current awards favourites, popular it girls and actresses with upcoming roles in baity projects and blockbusters. If they had done it as the young Hollywood issue, my personal lineup in no particular order would have been Wallis, Greta Gerwig, Rinko Kikuchi, Shailene Woodley, Lawrence (if she hadn't got the solo cover), Alicia Vikander, Alice Englert, Hailee Steinfeld, Chloe Moretz and Elle Fanning.
    This!!!!!! so much this. I loved to see the pics from young stars, always so fun (lol, I still love that Penelope pic) also the Hollywood Issue should always focus on the people who had a great year, where is Channing Tatum? Hathaway? Rebel Wilson? I know she is fat and magazines hate that but girl will be a bigger star than Olivia Wilde in a year or less. (fingers crossed)

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 1,275
    Olivia Wilde


  4. #44
    Far to bored Meegadeth's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Posts: 1,495
    Who is Olivia Wilde?

  5. #45
    Senior Member jeanne_dielman's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: In my head
    Posts: 1,244

  6. #46
    Senior Member boondoggle's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Posts: 416
    I agree that the cover and the photos inside look horrible. Bruce Weber's aesthetic doesn't fit with the glamorous Old Hollywood style that Leibovitz brings to these. Everything comes of as campy and lame (a dancing bear, Cooper and Affleck in plushie costumes). I am disappointed because most of the time they have incredible photo spreads, for example the one where actors are reenacting different Hitchock films.

  7. #47
    Senior Member jeanne_dielman's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Location: In my head
    Posts: 1,244



  8. #48
    Blastylicious! Blasty's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: The Land of the CHUNKALICIOUS!
    Posts: 9,100
    If Liam needs a first mate, I'll gladly leave shore for him.

  9. #49
    Senior Member HollyG's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2008
    Posts: 2,127
    Liam is fine

    [

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •