LOL, that’s exactly what I was talking about. To make your “negative” points about Crowe you’re using the LA Times who says he’s fine, Tapley who says he liked him but he’s not the stand out and Karger who said he liked him but others probably won’t. So you’re basically trying to sell three positive notices as negatives? All those three guys expressly say they liked him, lol!
Then you have one guy saying “solid but doesn’t reach much” (hardly negative), and “some guy” you never linked to (is that you? LoL) which is the only negative one. And you don’t even quote right the only legitimate tweet you had that’s negative, that is Clayton Davis’.
Kid, you have just two negatives. One is “Some guy” (no link, source, or anything) and the other one you don’t even quote the right post. I think you have nothing, dear. Better take the rest you promised you’d take.






















