Jessica Chastain Zero Dark Thirty
Marion Cotillard Rust and Bone
Judi Dench The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
Keira Knightley Anna Karenina
Jennifer Lawrence Silver Linings Playbook
Helen Mirren Hitchcock
Emmanuelle Riva Amour
Maggie Smith Quartet
Quvenzhan้ Wallis Beasts of the Southern Wild
Naomi Watts The Impossible
Other
Lawrence
Wallis
Chastain
Watts
Knightley
Riva
I was on the Knightley train for quite a while, but trust me, it's a dud. From the way some critics have panned it, I'm pretty sure AK is a terrific, risky movie of exactly the type that fails to get any major Oscar nominations (betting it's confined to Production Design and Costume Design). I thought it would get more supporters as more critics saw it, but it's still really divisive.
I tend not to want to argue about films with people that have signatures of those films.
![]()
The Knightley train has been derailed for a while. Were the critics holding off until now really going to be numerous or strongly behind it enough to resurrect Anna Karenina? No.
Sight unseen, it feels like the kind of thing that will age well, but for now it's chances are dead and buried. I feel behind the ball still listing Law in my most recent top 15 contenders for Supporting Actor. He's done too.
1. Jennifer Lawrence
2. Quevenzhane Wallis
3. Emmanuelle Riva
4. Helen Mirren
5. Jessica Chastain
6. Marion Cotillard
7. Keira Knightley
8. Naomi Watts
9. Judi Dench
10.Lol?
SLP is up to 84 on metacritic btw, so I guess Lawrence is back in the hunt for critics awards?![]()
Lol, I know right? Lawrence was gonna win a bunch regardless of how reviews were. Her frontrunner status guranteed her wins at like North Western Ohio Online Film Critics Circle or whatever. She'll take NYCC, possibly NBR, and she has a slight chance at LAFCA (she was runner up in 2010, but I'm not betting on it).
That could be applied to any contender. A "minimal amount of passion"? Sure, Keira will have that, among a small faction of AK zealots in the Academy. Basically, that indicates that she'll receive at least some votes. In making an argument for why she'll be among the top-five vote-getters, you need to more persuasively explain how/why she'll receive more votes than her competitors. Like, I'm sure Meryl Streep will receive a "minimal amount of passion" -- doesn't mean that's enough to get her nominated. A slew of actresses will have at least a "minimal amount of passion". That's not an explanation of what situates Knightley in the top five.