It's not bad because it's non-sexualised (I wouldn't have called her costume in any of the previous films sexualised - they all wore the same thing). It just looks so dirty and a bit basic.Originally Posted by Hatshepsutely
It's not bad because it's non-sexualised (I wouldn't have called her costume in any of the previous films sexualised - they all wore the same thing). It just looks so dirty and a bit basic.
So I'm the only one bothered by the hair?
Movies recently reviewed by RRA:
Star Trek (2009)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Oblivion (2013)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The New RRA: Less Spam, still 100% ruining AD.
No. Absolutely not.
It looks far too much like a wig. Obviously it is, but we're not supposed to be able to tell, you know?
Some people can sport that particular cut (real or not), but....Halle isn't one of them. I keep expecting the moment after that pic was taken for the mama bird to fly back to that nest and feed its freshly-hatched chicklings.
Otherwise the suit doesn't bother me.
Movies recently reviewed by RRA:
Star Trek (2009)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Oblivion (2013)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The New RRA: Less Spam, still 100% ruining AD.
Bishop and Warpath are in DOFP.
https://vine.co/v/bPXUHdHMwnm
Movies recently reviewed by RRA:
Star Trek (2009)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Oblivion (2013)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The New RRA: Less Spam, still 100% ruining AD.
I imagine that's on purpose.
I have no clue who Warpath is but I didn't think Bishop would ever be in any of these films. Sadly, though, it's looking more and more likely that Jean Grey, Cyclops and Older Mystique won't be making appearances.
Right. Kevlar tends to be basic. And get dirty. This ain't NY Fashion week.
no it has nothing to do with being non-sexualized or non-shiny costume and everything to do with it not looking like a body armor if that was really the intent. it looks like Berry just picked up felt papers from a random school supply shop and cut-and-pasted the crap on her body
if this is seen on daylight, it will look incredibly cheap in a non-realistic way... if that makes sense
but if this is something that is used for the alternate future then it might not look so bad if they'll film it literally dark for that timeline
having Bishop here is like they may be borrowing something from the 90's X-Men cartoon version of the DOFP.
Warpath on the otherhand sounds like a mere filler
You're reaching. If you want glamorous costumes, you can still watch the Wonder Woman pilot that never came to be!
Elena
i'm not reaching. and you didn't even bother reading my whole post. nothing in there says that i'm looking for a glamorous or a sexualized costume
wth is wrong with the reading comprehension of some people here? you say something and these people reply you with an entirely different thing that was neither mentioned nor insinuated in your post.
you say the costume looks sad/cheap, some people respond "well it's because it's not sexualized" or "maybe you'll be happy with Wonder Woman"
just WTF?
Last edited by amsm07; 04-25-2013 at 02:46 PM. Reason: added incredelousness. just wth?
You obviously can't take a joke.
And please tell me how you could improve it and keep it practical.
Elena
hahaha joke is so funny, i'm rolling
all i know is that it looks like a school project
how to improve it? maybe for starters use a material that does NOT remind you of this:
if that's supposed to be a body armor for "practical" use , that's about as protective as sticking post-its in your body.
i GET that it's not supposed to be a flashy costume and there's nothing in my criticism against it that states boobs should be popping out or that shiny leatherette or spandex should be the way to go
anyway i'm done ranting with that crappy looking costume. like i said in my previous post, it might not matter at all if it's going to be filmed under low/dark lighting which i'd assume would be the cliche thing to do for a dystopian future
Last edited by amsm07; 04-25-2013 at 06:06 PM.
Nowadays the bodysuits/parts of suits of superheros are often cgi and added in post-production. What Halle is wearing might not be the final look on screen.
This is silly, you can't compare a candid shot probably taken with a camera with how the actual film will look once proper cameras and lighting do their work.
In the war of directors of Marvel properties using Twitter to cocktease the fanboys, I think Mr. Singer is whooping Marc Webb's behind pretty well so far.
https://twitter.com/BryanSinger/stat...235840/photo/1
Movies recently reviewed by RRA:
Star Trek (2009)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Oblivion (2013)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The New RRA: Less Spam, still 100% ruining AD.
I don't even care about this movie except for the hot actors, but LOL:
OMG!
Wow, he took Erik's departure pretty hard.
By the looks of that pic and this movie set in the 70s, you know he's nose deep enough in snow to open up a ski resort.
Movies recently reviewed by RRA:
Star Trek (2009)
Pain & Gain (2013)
Oblivion (2013)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
The New RRA: Less Spam, still 100% ruining AD.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
