View Poll Results: only 5 nominees in...

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2001

    3 16.67%
  • 2002

    5 27.78%
  • 2003

    1 5.56%
  • 2004

    4 22.22%
  • 2005

    10 55.56%
  • 2006

    2 11.11%
  • 2007

    3 16.67%
  • 2008

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 71

Thread: New rule: Which year(s) would still have had 5 nominees?

  1. #41
    You called me a bitch on the Internet with_one_voice's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: New York
    Posts: 10,942
    Quote Originally Posted by McTeague View Post
    It’s nutty to think Walk the Line wouldn’t have made it:

    1- It had PGA, Golden Globe and BFCA noms for Best Picture

    2- I’m not sure of this but someone mentioned it in its year: it was the first film to be snubbed from BP with 2 lead acting noms and an editing nom, since The African Queen in 1951.

    3- It was 82% fresh at RT and was beloved by audiences (it’s still 7.9 at IMDb)

    4- It had 5 noms including 2 big, with BP it would have been 6. Tech people loved it too.

    Really, it’s a no-brainer. It would have been a Top 5 nominee in many other years. It was an Oscar film from head to toes.
    Yeah, it really seems like Walk the Line would've made it in. Hmm.

    What's your rationale for 2001? Looking over that year, I don't necessarily disagree with you, though we had two lone director nominees (Black Hawk Down and Mulholland Dr). I think BHD, in particular, would've had a good shot at getting in with the 5% rule.

  2. #42
    Senior Member MrJeffery's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: NYC
    Posts: 1,482
    Quote Originally Posted by with_one_voice View Post
    This discussion has been revived.

    Which year do you all think would've had 5 nominees?

    I think 2005 or 2008, the two years in which a lone director nominee did not exist. I think with this current system, if there were enough directors voting for a lone director, like Mereilles or Almodovar, those voters would've helped push that director's film to 5% and a BP nominee, too. This isn't a perfect method, but I'm not sure how else to guesstimate.

    That said, Walk the Line seems like it would've been pretty likely in 2005.
    yea. for me, i don't really see a year where i don't think there would have been only 5 nominees. in '08, i wouldn't have been surprised by the inclusion of The Dark Knight, Wall-E, or The Wrestler.

  3. #43
    Emotionally Susceptible
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 18,506
    Quote Originally Posted by with_one_voice View Post
    Yeah, it really seems like Walk the Line would've made it in. Hmm.

    What's your rationale for 2001? Looking over that year, I don't necessarily disagree with you, though we had two lone director nominees (Black Hawk Down and Mulholland Dr). I think BHD, in particular, would've had a good shot at getting in with the 5% rule.
    Yeah I'm kinda sure MD wouldn't have made it, but I agree BHD is hard to say. But I lean towards “No”. I mean, we know there has to be one yar of no other nominees beyond the Top 5, and I think BHD is clearly a lesser competitor than Walk the Line and The Dark Knight Rises.

    Yeah, it had a Directors Guild nod, but it just goes to show it was a director’s thing alone. It didn’t have a SAG nod, it didn’t have Globe nods, it didn’t have BAFTA nod (and Scott is British), it didn’t have Producers nod… The industry didn’t really back it, it seems it was just something the directors admired for the directorial and technical endeavour, not something with widespread love.

    Of course it would have only needed a 5% of #1 votes, and it must have had support if it got that director nom, but we don’t really know how it got it (it may have been with tons of #2 placements which are still very important in the rest of the categories, it may have been with #! Votes after the other 4 nominees shared the other some 500 votes, etc.) and I’d say this is clearly our weakest likely #6.

    2001: Black Hawk Down
    2002: Talk to Her had a really big win over a BP nominee and was riding a wave of popularity
    2003: I don’t think anybody can doubt Cold Mountain, City of God and In America
    2004: Yeah Vera Drake and ESOTSM were in.
    2005: Walk the Line, but I also think Constant Gardener could have been in
    2006: Dreamgirls easily, United 93 maybe
    2007: Diving Bell easily, Into the Wild maybe
    2008: The Dark Knight

    I guess 2002 is another candidate since AMPAS clearly didn’t love Far from Heaven much and Talk to Her is a really small foreign film, but its win over Gangs is indicative of widespread support as a film among AMPAS, whereas BHD tech wins don’t imply love as a film.

    I also have doubts with 2007, as TDBATB is also foreign and it instead had no wins, but 4 nods including director, screenplay and editing is just too big, no? I’d say it’s between 2001 and 2007, come to think of it.

  4. #44
    Senior Member Moviefreak's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: New York
    Posts: 11,872
    I think Adaptation was clearly 6th in 2002. PGA, SAG, WGA nominations as well as 3 acting nods. Plus GG nominations for Picture and Director.

  5. #45
    Emotionally Susceptible
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 18,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Moviefreak View Post
    I think Adaptation was clearly 6th in 2002. PGA, SAG, WGA nominations as well as 3 acting nods. Plus GG nominations for Picture and Director.
    Oh, true. I keep forgetting how big that film was in its day.

    Then I'm even more confident that our "Only 5 nominees" year is 2001 or 2007.

  6. #46
    Team Foxcatcher! DirkDiggler's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2009
    Location: Grapes Are Fun!
    Posts: 8,567
    I was just going to mention Adaptation GRRRRRRR
    "I'm a firm believer in karma, and I think this situation is a huge learning lesson for me.
    To grow and expand as a spiritual human being. I want to lead a country one day for all I know".

  7. #47
    Into The Wild would not have made it in, that movie underperformed very badly (missed out on Picture, Director, Actor, Supporting Actress, Editing, Adapted Screenplay and Original Song).

  8. #48
    Tickle, tickle Thomas's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 13,121
    I think Into the Wild was a bit like The Station Agent. A movie that AMPAS just did not buy into as much as other awards bodies.

  9. #49
    2000: Almost Famous and Billy Elliott would have easily made it.
    2001: Black Hawk Down would have likely made it. Possibly Mulholland Drive.
    2002: Talk to Her and Adaptation
    2003: Cold Mountain, City of God and In America. Possibly Finding Nemo.
    2004: Hotel Rwanda, Vera Drake and Eternal Sunshine. Possibly Finding Nemo
    2005: Walk the Line
    2006: Dreamgirls. Possibly United 93.
    2007: Diving Bell and the Butterfly easily. Possibly Ratatouille.
    2008. Definitely WALL*E and The Dark Knight. Doubt and The Wrestler were also likely



  10. #50
    Emotionally Susceptible
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 18,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Zuckerberg View Post
    2000: Almost Famous and Billy Elliott would have easily made it.
    2001: Black Hawk Down would have likely made it. Possibly Mulholland Drive.
    2002: Talk to Her and Adaptation
    2003: Cold Mountain, City of God and In America. Possibly Finding Nemo.
    2004: Hotel Rwanda, Vera Drake and Eternal Sunshine. Possibly Finding Nemo
    2005: Walk the Line
    2006: Dreamgirls. Possibly United 93.
    2007: Diving Bell and the Butterfly easily. Possibly Ratatouille.
    2008. Definitely WALL*E and The Dark Knight. Doubt and The Wrestler were also likely
    You however need to choose a year that only had 5 nominees, so one of your "easily" has to go.

  11. #51
    Basically, I was saying none of them would have had just 5. 2005 being the likeliest, since I only listed Walk the Line but even then, I couldn't see it missing with the current rules.

    I dunno, maybe 2001



  12. #52
    Emotionally Susceptible
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 18,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Eduardo Zuckerberg View Post
    Basically, I was saying none of them would have had just 5. 2005 being the likeliest, since I only listed Walk the Line but even then, I couldn't see it missing with the current rules.

    I dunno, maybe 2001
    But the point of the thread is that, when the new rule was announced, AMPAS said that they had re-counted the results of the last years since 2001 and they had one year of 5 nominees and one year of 9 nominees, with the rest in between. We know there was one year of just 5 nominees. I also think it would have been 2001. No way 2005, because Walk the Line was so in.

  13. #53
    I AM YOUR KHALEESI! hurricanesmith's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Lubitschin'
    Posts: 14,136
    My guess is the answer would be 2008, only we wouldn't have had the nominees we actually got. At least Dark Knight and possibly Wall-E as well would have swapped in for Reader or Frost/Nixon.

    HS

  14. #54
    Member
    Join Date: Nov 2012
    Location: United Kingdom
    Posts: 55
    Also, had the rule been introduced in the 90s, here's which films I think would have made the cut along with the five nominated:

    1990: 'Reversal of Fortune', ''The Grifters'
    1991: 'Boyz N The Hood', 'Thelma and Louise', 'Terminator 2: Judgement Day' (maybe), 'The Fisher King', 'Raise the Red Lantern'
    1992: 'The Player'
    1993: 'Farewell My Concubine', 'Philadelphia', 'The Age of Innocence'
    1994: 'Red', 'Bullets over Broadway', 'The Lion King'
    1995: 'The Usual Suspects', 'Toy Story', 'Dead Man Walking', 'Leaving Las Vegas'
    1996: 'The People vs. Larry Flynt', 'Sling Blade', 'Hamlet'
    1997: 'Boogie Nights', 'The Sweet Hereafter'
    1998: 'The Truman Show', 'Gods and Monsters'
    1999: 'All About My Mother', 'Being John Malkovich', 'Magnolia', 'Topsy-Turvy'

    Your thoughts?

  15. #55
    Fame is a chore. Atonenent.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2010
    Posts: 5,792
    Umm, I love Raise the Red Lantern and Farewell My Concubine but they certainly wouldn't have made it. The rest seems plausible.
    I know I've got a big ego, I really don't know why it's such a big deal, though.

  16. #56
    Emotionally Susceptible
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Posts: 18,506
    1999:
    For sure:
    1- Being John Malkovich
    2- The Talented Mr. Ripley

    Maybe:
    3- All About My Mother
    4- Topsy Turvy
    5- Magnolia
    6- The Hurricane
    7- Boys Don’t Cry

    1998:
    For sure: Nothing

    Maybe:
    1- The Truman Show
    2- Gods and Monsters

    1997:

    For sure:
    1- Amistad
    2- Boogie Nights

    Maybe:
    3- The Wings of the Dove
    4- The Sweet Hereafter

    1996:

    For sure: Nothing

    Maybe:
    1- Sling Blade

    1995:
    For sure:
    1- Leaving Las vegas
    2- Dead Man Walking

    Maybe:
    3- The Usual Suspects
    4- Nixon

    1994:
    For sure:
    1- Bullets Over Broadway
    2- The Madness of King George

    Maybe:
    3- Three Colors: Red

    1993:
    For sure:
    - Nothing

    Maybe:
    1- The Age of Innocence

    1992:
    For sure:
    1- The Player

    1991:
    For sure:
    1- Thelma & Louise
    2- The Fisher King

    Maybe:
    3- Boys ‘n the Hood
    4- Fried Green Tomatoes

    1990:
    For sure:
    1- Reversal of Fortune
    2- The Grifters

    Maybe:
    3- Cyrano de Bergerac

  17. #57
    The Most Interesting Man in the World CMJ's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Los Angeles
    Posts: 2,826
    I think Road to Perdition was pretty close to getting in in 2002 (probably not as close as Adaptation though). I know the only major nod it scored was Newman, but I seem to recall hearing quite a bit of last minute buzz for it the week or so before nomination. And they ran a helluva campaign for it here in LA.

  18. #58
    Exquisite taste Jali's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Spain
    Posts: 5,504
    2000 8 nominees (Almost famous - Billy Elliot - Wonder boys)

    2001 7 nominees (Black Hawk down, Amelie)

    2002 6 nominees (Road to Perdition)

    2003 7 nominees (Cold Mountain, City of god)

    2004 7 nominees (Vera Drake, Hotel Rwanda)

    2005 7 nominees (The constant gardener, Walk the line)

    2006 8 nominees (Pan's labyrinth, Dreamgirls, United 93)

    2007 6 nominees (The diving bell and the butterfly)

    2008 7 nominees (The dark knight Wall·E)

    2009 7 nominees (Up in the air, Precious, Inglorius basterds, The hurt locker, Avatar, Up, An education)

    2010 7 nominees (The king's speech, True grit, The social network, Inception, The fighter, 127 hours, Black swan)


    Jali Awards Best Actress 1920-1925
    1920 Tora Teje, Erotikon // 1921 Pola Negri, The wildcat
    1922 Anna May Wong, The toll of the sea // 1923 Marion Davies, Little old New York
    1924 Marie Prevost, The marriage circle // 1925 Gloria Swanson, Stage struck

  19. #59
    You called me a bitch on the Internet with_one_voice's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: New York
    Posts: 10,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Jali View Post
    2000 8 nominees (Almost famous - Billy Elliot - Wonder boys)

    2001 7 nominees (Black Hawk down, Amelie)

    2002 6 nominees (Road to Perdition)

    2003 7 nominees (Cold Mountain, City of god)

    2004 7 nominees (Vera Drake, Hotel Rwanda)

    2005 7 nominees (The constant gardener, Walk the line)

    2006 8 nominees (Pan's labyrinth, Dreamgirls, United 93)

    2007 6 nominees (The diving bell and the butterfly)

    2008 7 nominees (The dark knight Wall·E)

    2009 7 nominees (Up in the air, Precious, Inglorius basterds, The hurt locker, Avatar, Up, An education)

    2010 7 nominees (The king's speech, True grit, The social network, Inception, The fighter, 127 hours, Black swan)
    At least one of the years from 2001-2008 would've had five nominees.

  20. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by McTeague View Post
    1999:


    1994:
    For sure:
    1- Bullets Over Broadway
    2- The Madness of King George

    Maybe:
    3- Three Colors: Red
    Hmmm. I think The Lion King would have had at least a fighting chance no?



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •