<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Awards Daily Forums</title>
		<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/</link>
		<description>This is the discussion forum for Awards Daily. Talk cover from Oscars, BAFTAs, Golden Globes, Grammys, Emmys, Tonys and all the rest!</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:50:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Best Adapted Screenplay</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33081-Best-Adapted-Screenplay&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY 
12 years a slave 
August: Osage County 
Before Midnight 
Labor Day 
The Monuments Men</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY<br />
12 years a slave<br />
August: Osage County<br />
Before Midnight<br />
Labor Day<br />
The Monuments Men</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?4-FILM-pred">FILM::pred</category>
			<dc:creator>dontspell</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33081-Best-Adapted-Screenplay</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Best Original Screenplay</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33079-Best-Original-Screenplay&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:27:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY 
American Hustle 
The Counselor 
Fruitvale Station 
Gravity 
Inside Llewyn Davis</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY<br />
American Hustle<br />
The Counselor<br />
Fruitvale Station<br />
Gravity<br />
Inside Llewyn Davis</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?4-FILM-pred">FILM::pred</category>
			<dc:creator>dontspell</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33079-Best-Original-Screenplay</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Guillaume Canet's Blood Ties trailer]]></title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33078-Guillaume-Canet-s-Blood-Ties-trailer&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:21:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qHqiYGKlns</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/-qHqiYGKlns?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>mea culpa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33078-Guillaume-Canet-s-Blood-Ties-trailer</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Official 66th Cannes Film Festival: Starring Nicole Kidman as EVERYTHING</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33077-Official-66th-Cannes-Film-Festival-Starring-Nicole-Kidman-as-EVERYTHING&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Continue.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Continue.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>erikdean</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33077-Official-66th-Cannes-Film-Festival-Starring-Nicole-Kidman-as-EVERYTHING</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bizarre Acting Races.</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33076-Bizarre-Acting-Races&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I was looking at the '95 Supporting Actor field and precursors, it seemed like nobody was strong.    
 
Spacey-GG, SAG 
Harris-GG, SAG (Won)...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I was looking at the '95 Supporting Actor field and precursors, it seemed like nobody was strong.   <br />
<br />
Spacey-GG, SAG<br />
Harris-GG, SAG (Won)<br />
Roth-BAFTA (Won), GG<br />
Pitt-GG (Won)<br />
Cromwell-Nothing<br />
<br />
Kinda surprised Cromwell made it in over Don Cheadle who had a SAG Nod and the most critic support out of any Supporting Actor that year (won LA, NSFC and 2nd place at NYFCC).  I guess there love for Babe explains it.  Pitt is almost equally surprising because they seem to never nominate Sci-Fi performances and don't like nominating male movie stars in Supporting.  He doesn't win the Globe, he probably doesn't make it. Still, there can't be too many other field since the start of the SAG where no one hit all the precursors and the winners were different at every award show.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?4-FILM-pred">FILM::pred</category>
			<dc:creator>Matt24</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33076-Bizarre-Acting-Races</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Frances Ha (Baumbach, 2013)</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33074-Frances-Ha-(Baumbach-2013)&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have to say I pretty much loved it. Its hard to talk about, I guess, without mentioning Girls and hipsters, but while it includes a lot of that...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have to say I pretty much loved it. Its hard to talk about, I guess, without mentioning Girls and hipsters, but while it includes a lot of that realm's cliches, it feels very true. It just absolutely works, in my opinion. <br />
<br />
I also love Greta Gerwig. This certainly isn't a stretch for her, but she still nails it.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?5-FILM-crit">FILM::crit</category>
			<dc:creator>Cesky</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33074-Frances-Ha-(Baumbach-2013)</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BFCA : Best Actress in an action movie (2013)</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33073-BFCA-Best-Actress-in-an-action-movie-(2013)&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Make your choice ... in the most ambitious category ever :D</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Make your choice ... in the most ambitious category ever :D</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?14-Other-Awards">Other Awards</category>
			<dc:creator>francesco-natale</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33073-BFCA-Best-Actress-in-an-action-movie-(2013)</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Random Reading Thoughts: Which books are prime fodder for Oscar dramas?</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33071-Random-Reading-Thoughts-Which-books-are-prime-fodder-for-Oscar-dramas&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Just started The Zookeeper's Wife and I can already tell it is going to be such a baity role for Chastain. The way Diane Ackerman describes Antonina...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Just started The Zookeeper's Wife and I can already tell it is going to be such a baity role for Chastain. The way Diane Ackerman describes Antonina is basically like Chastain's mother character from TToL crossed with any Disney heroine that communes with animals (think Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella). <br />
<br />
And for some reason I thought it was a novel, but it's actually non-fiction.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?21-OTHER-MEDIA-news">OTHER MEDIA::news</category>
			<dc:creator>Mmelissa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33071-Random-Reading-Thoughts-Which-books-are-prime-fodder-for-Oscar-dramas</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>James Gray Sets Sci-Fi Project</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33070-James-Gray-Sets-Sci-Fi-Project&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/Gustavo_HR/we_own_the_night_movie_image_james_gray_zpsa1646065.jpg ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://smg.photobucket.com/user/Gustavo_HR/media/we_own_the_night_movie_image_james_gray_zpsa1646065.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/Gustavo_HR/we_own_the_night_movie_image_james_gray_zpsa1646065.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
</div><br />
<br />
OMFG :D<br />
<br />
<u>Source:</u> <a href="http://variety.com/2013/film/news/james-gray-sets-sci-fi-project-at-rt-features-1200482828/" target="_blank">http://variety.com/2013/film/news/ja...es-1200482828/</a><br />
<br />
By <a href="http://variety.com/author/dave-mcnary/" target="_blank">Dave McNary</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			Brazil-based RT Features has come on board to produce an untitled  James Gray sci-fi thriller based on Gray’s original script from which he  will direct.<br />
 Deal was announced Friday at Cannes. RT CEO Rodrigo Teixeira will  produce, with the company’s Sophie Mas and Lourenco Sant’ Anna executive  producing.<br />
 Ethan Gross, who was a writer on the show “Fringe,” will co-write with Gray.<br />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>Shy_Hallaman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33070-James-Gray-Sets-Sci-Fi-Project</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David O. Russell To Direct Leonardo DiCaprio And Robert De Niro ...</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33069-David-O-Russell-To-Direct-Leonardo-DiCaprio-And-Robert-De-Niro&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In Legacy of Secrecy. 
 
http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/david-russell-direct-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-de-niro-legacy-secrecy/ 
 
Sounds pretty...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In Legacy of Secrecy.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/david-russell-direct-leonardo-dicaprio-robert-de-niro-legacy-secrecy/" target="_blank">http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/d...egacy-secrecy/</a><br />
<br />
Sounds pretty interesting.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>oliksa</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33069-David-O-Russell-To-Direct-Leonardo-DiCaprio-And-Robert-De-Niro</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Random Film Thoughts: Did all 1967 BP Nominees Suck?</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33068-Random-Film-Thoughts-Did-all-1967-BP-Nominees-Suck&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Oh, and considering one of the recent AD trending topics, the following reviews may contain SPOILERS of things as recent and unknown as The Graduate...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Oh, and considering one of the recent AD trending topics, the following reviews may contain SPOILERS of things as recent and unknown as The Graduate and Tolstoy's War and Peace. <br />
<br />
BE WARNED! But I'll try to hide them.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
It&#8217;s a pity to watch <b>The Graduate</b> (Nichols, 1967) fall apart in its second half. Up until Katharine Ross appears it&#8217;s such a well-observed, clever dramedy about middle-class confusion! The characters are very well drawn-out and even the more caricaturesque aspects are well integrated in a more realistic tone. <br />
<br />
But the second half? Out of nowhere<span>
    <span style="margin-bottom: 5px;">
       <input type="button" value="Show Spoiler" style="color: #4E4E4E; background-color: #EAEAEA; border: 1px solid #CECECE; border-radius: 3px 3px 3px 3px; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 10px; padding: 5px;" 
	   onclick="if (this.value == 'Show Spoiler') { 	
	   this.parentNode.parentNode.getElementsByTagName('span')[1].getElementsByTagName('span')[0].style.display = '';
	   this.value = 'Hide Spoiler'; } 
	   else 
	   { this.parentNode.parentNode.getElementsByTagName('span')[1].getElementsByTagName('span')[0].style.display = 'none'; 
	   this.value = 'Show Spoiler';}">
    </span>
    <span>
        <span style="border: 0px; padding: 0 3px 0 3px; display: none;"> Hoffmann becomes a nutty stalker and, even worse, Ross is attracted to that instead of grossed-out, and they start one of the least believable banter-romances in the story of American film, the movie out of nowhere becomes a very silly screwball comedy with jarring moments of slapstick (that wedding!) and all the perception and understanding for the Bancroft character that had made the first half so poignant goes out of the board to transform her into a hateful raging bitch with no grounds whatsoever in reality. And because Nichols probably knows that entire last half came absolutely out of nowhere and the post-wedding joy rush was unearned and fake, he decides to end the proceedings with an eve more out-of-nowhere sour note.</span>
    </span>
</span> That bittersweet ending is what the film should have, sure, but after the jarring, dumb events that lead to it, it feels more like an embarrassing apology for that inexcusable second half.<br />
<br />
And it really is a pity, because the first half had all the elements of a truly great film. And Anne Bancroft is all kinds of great. <br />
<br />
<br />
I also saw the six hours and forty minutes (and plus) of <b>War and Peace</b> (Bondarchuk, 1967). I think the opinion that the 1956 version of the novel is the bad one while the Bondarchuk one is great reeks of cultural inferiority complex. Oh, because the 1967 version is Russian and is almost 7 hours long it must be more faithful and rigorous. Well, the truth is it&#8217;s quite similar, but Vidor&#8217;s version is more cinematic (despite having less supposedly visionary flourishes) and better paced, while keeping all the lyricism and complexity. <br />
<br />
At that running time, there&#8217;s time for a bit of everything. Some of the &#8220;artistic&#8221; flourishes enhance the proceedings and result in truly rapturous passages, and some other come out of nowhere and make some scenes unnecessarily abstract and a bit ridiculous (an example among many: the marriage agreement between Pierre and Helene, done almost silently but with the sound of water drops falling down a pipe or into a well or something feels overdone in its excessive underlining of how awkward that marriage is). At points, especially for the first two hours, those flourishes even make the film just too dreamy, which I don&#8217;t think is fitting for a story that gets so much of its meaning through the particulars and details of intricate plotting and who is so essentially narrative. The passages in which a voiceover directly reads excerpts from the novel with Tolstoy comments the actions and going philosophical about its meaning could have worked if the voice reading it wasn&#8217;t so solemn. It almost sounds like a parody of Tolstoy&#8217;s imposing image and the idea of him as this solemn man who talks all the time about the deepest things. Another moment where an artistic flourish is totally unwelcome is when Andrei overhears Natasha, who&#8217;s in another room, at night, rambling about the moon and the beauty of life. In this version, by that point, we have barely met Natasha, and even less we have heard her talking. But still Bondarchuk never shows where that voice comes from and all we see is Andrei gazing at the forest at night, and then a dreamy voice starts rambling while the camera flies into the forest. I guess someone who doesn&#8217;t know the story well simply cannot know that Andrei is hearing Natasha and falling in love with her just for those ramblings. If you don&#8217;t know the story, you may think Andrei is just dreaming of the muses or hearing some nymphs singing in the forest? It may be beautiful in itself, but it misses the mark by far of sending home the point that Natasha&#8217;s sensuality and love for life is making Andrei feel alive again and making him fall for her. <br />
<br />
But some other times the results are amazing. In the ball where Natasha is officially introduced to Andrei, all the crazy camera work, the unconventional editing and the dreamy touches truly convey the whirlpool Natasha is living and make you understand everything she goes through. Or when Pierre witnesses the debacle in Moscow after the French occupy it, the hell that&#8217;s unleashed comes to life in vivid terms, and you notice how affecting it is for Pierre. I guess I&#8217;d say those flourishes work for the best when they are linked to the characters and convey their evolution, and don&#8217;t work when they obey to Bondarchuk wanting to comment or pointlessly embellish the action or wanting to artificially introduce Tolstoy&#8217;s voice. <br />
<br />
Likewise, in those seven hours there are moments in which the epic aspects work and the effort of having millions of extras and hundreds of cameras to film them pays off, and the brutality and scope of the war is captured, but some other times it feels like academic, pointless re-enactment. <br />
<br />
So, it&#8217;s a mixed bag. The overall outcome is decidedly positive, but there are undeniable flaws that make the movie feel academic at times, vapid at other times, and too enslaved by the novel. I think the segments that stay closer to one character work better than the segments that want to become more social, abstractly philosophical or historical. The film was released in four instalments, and the second and fourth, much more focused, respectively, in Natasha and Pierre, are the best, especially Natasha&#8217;s. I&#8217;d give those two movies a better grade if valued separately than I give to the whole movie. Vidor&#8217;s incredibly underrated version is much more concise and does a better work translating the literary language to filmic language, and really, I challenge anyone who has seen both to tell me what episode is in the Bondarchuk version and is not in the Vidor version and really adds that much. It&#8217;s amazing that, despite Bondarchuk&#8217;s version being 2.5 times longer, in terms of plot points it basically eliminates the same from the novel, and there are around two scenes at most that aren&#8217;t in Vidor&#8217;s. In fact, Vidor develops much better the relationship between <span>
    <span style="margin-bottom: 5px;">
       <input type="button" value="Show Spoiler" style="color: #4E4E4E; background-color: #EAEAEA; border: 1px solid #CECECE; border-radius: 3px 3px 3px 3px; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold; margin-top: 10px; padding: 5px;" 
	   onclick="if (this.value == 'Show Spoiler') { 	
	   this.parentNode.parentNode.getElementsByTagName('span')[1].getElementsByTagName('span')[0].style.display = '';
	   this.value = 'Hide Spoiler'; } 
	   else 
	   { this.parentNode.parentNode.getElementsByTagName('span')[1].getElementsByTagName('span')[0].style.display = 'none'; 
	   this.value = 'Show Spoiler';}">
    </span>
    <span>
        <span style="border: 0px; padding: 0 3px 0 3px; display: none;">Pierre and Natasha, showing the friendship between them from the beginning, in a way that makes the ending earned. There&#8217;s nothing in Bondarchuk&#8217;s version, least of all chemistry between them, that makes you think Natasha and Pierre make a good pair</span>
    </span>
</span>. <br />
<br />
And that leads me to the acting: Henry Fonda may feel too 100% American to play Pierre, sure, but at least he has the charisma to make you understand why he becomes so popular in Moscow&#8217;s nights and why Natasha may end up falling for him despite being much less handsome that her other two suitors, Andrei and Anatol. Bondarchuk&#8217;s performance as Pierre may be technically good and appropriately internalized, but he&#8217;s such a charisma vacuum that all the time you wish the action goes back to Natasha. Speaking of whom, Lyudmila Saveleva is absolutely wonderful in the role. Maybe a tad overdone in some scenes, but 100% convincing, intense and appealing, both as an adolescent and as the more adult woman in the final act. I may prefer her to Audrey Hepburn, although Hepburn was perfect for the role too. Tikhonov is as inexpressive as Andrei as Mel Ferrer was, but at least Ferrer was more melancholic than angry, which I think is the best approach to the character. It&#8217;s hard not to hate this Andrei. And the guy playing Anatol is just unconvincing as the womaniser that would fool even the most sensible women in Moscow, while Vittorio Gassman was exactly <i>that</i> kind of guy. So, everyone save Natasha is better in the American version, but Natasha is the key character so in the end the result is, let&#8217;s say, even. <br />
<br />
I don&#8217;t know, while it&#8217;s a god movie in the final balance and has very high peaks, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d recommend anybody, not even the most hardcore cinephiles, to spend nearly 7 hours watching it. It&#8217;s like, read the novel instead, or, if you&#8217;re not inclined to it, watch the better film version by Vidor. Watching this version ended up feeling like an act of &#8220;completism&#8221;.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?5-FILM-crit">FILM::crit</category>
			<dc:creator>McTeague</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33068-Random-Film-Thoughts-Did-all-1967-BP-Nominees-Suck</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Spike Lee takes over Michael Mann's "Gold"]]></title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33067-Spike-Lee-takes-over-Michael-Mann-s-quot-Gold-quot&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:41:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTTtZgqfdeVWVeiKOehwEpmwPF57rkiW7NIWFEhUHySuAPhX8QzsA  
 
_Source:_...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTTtZgqfdeVWVeiKOehwEpmwPF57rkiW7NIWFEhUHySuAPhX8QzsA" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<u>Source:</u> <a href="http://thefilmstage.com/news/spike-lee-strikes-gold-taking-former-michael-mann-project-under-wing/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">http://thefilmstage.com/news/spike-l...medium=twitter</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<div>
				Originally Posted by <strong>Nick Newman</strong>
				
			</div>
			<div class="message"><b>Michael Mann</b> is back in the news, and there was a period where <b>Mann</b> pushed forward on a few titles before moving on, repeating the process once more and driving us faithful a little crazy. <a href="http://thefilmstage.com/news/michael-mann-to-direct-paul-haggis-script-gold/" target="_blank">One of these</a> was <i><b>Gold</b></i>, a prospecting tale that <b>Paul Haggis</b> (<i><b>Crash</b></i>) had brought to the director’s intention; as written on spec by <b>John Zinman</b> and <b>Patrick Massett</b> (<i><b>Friday Night Lights, Tomb Raider</b></i>),  the fact-based movie, set in the ’90s, follows the Bre-X Minerals  scandal, in which “a rough-around-the-edges prospector who stumbles onto  one of the largest gold mines in the world.” <br />
<br />
<br />
 This was not meant to be. Instead, <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column-post/spike-lee-attached-direct-former-michael-mann-movie-gold-exclusive-92231" target="_blank">TheWrap</a> have learned — more than two years after the project was last noted on this site — that it’s falling into the lap of <b>Spike Lee</b>. As he continues post-production work on <i><b>Oldboy</b></i>, <a href="http://blackbearpictures.com/films-coming-soon/gold/" target="_blank">Black Bear Pictures</a>‘ website lists his name under the director slot — a little unofficial, but almost as close as we could get to a confirmation.</div>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>Shy_Hallaman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33067-Spike-Lee-takes-over-Michael-Mann-s-quot-Gold-quot</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Uma Thurman to Play Anita Bryant</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33066-Uma-Thurman-to-Play-Anita-Bryant&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Biopic to be directed by Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman: 
 
http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/cannes-uma-thurman-playing-super-prude-anita-bryant/ 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Biopic to be directed by Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/cannes-uma-thurman-playing-super-prude-anita-bryant/" target="_blank">http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/cann...-anita-bryant/</a><br />
<br />
Uma Thurman will star as controversial anti-gay activist Anita Bryant in Anita, produced by Sex And the City creator Darren Star, Howard Rosenman, Jeffrey Schwarz and Dennis Erdman. Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman will direct from a screenplay by Chad Hodge. Those filmmakers, who most recently helmed Lovelace, won Oscars for Common Threads: Stories From The Quilt and The Times Of Harvey Milk. Anita Bryant doesn’t stand a chance here! The film follows the singer and orange juice spokeswoman who, after allowing a gay screenwriter into her home, is forced to confront her past as an anti-gay Christian crusader who successfully campaigned to overturn a gay rights law in Florida and whose polarizing views destroyed her show biz career in the process. The film will be shopped here at Cannes.<br />
<br />
Thurman next stars in Lars Van Triers’ Nymphomaniac, and the next film by the directors is The Battle Of AmFAR, which HBO broadcasts in December. UTA Independent and WME are co-repping domestic.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>BlackDarkLake</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33066-Uma-Thurman-to-Play-Anita-Bryant</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Last Vegas trailer: The Hangover for Old People starring 4 Oscar winners</title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33065-Last-Vegas-trailer-The-Hangover-for-Old-People-starring-4-Oscar-winners&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:29:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4IlkUXBqIE 
 
I think after you watch the trailer, you can see why this film trailer deserves its own thread. :lol: 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<iframe class="restrain" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/R4IlkUXBqIE?wmode=opaque" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
I think after you watch the trailer, you can see why this film trailer deserves its own thread. :lol:<br />
<br />
There is a new Wolfpack in town.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>DirkDiggler</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33065-Last-Vegas-trailer-The-Hangover-for-Old-People-starring-4-Oscar-winners</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson directing Truman Capote's unpublished Summer Crossing]]></title>
			<link>http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33059-Scarlett-Johansson-directing-Truman-Capote-s-unpublished-Summer-Crossing&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Another actress will be embarking on directing career. Scarlett Johansson will be directing Summer Crossing, an adaptation of Truman Capote's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Another actress will be embarking on directing career. Scarlett Johansson will be directing Summer Crossing, an adaptation of Truman Capote's unpublished novel Summer Crossing. The novel is about a 17-year old New York debutante who embarks a summer romance with a Jewish valet in the summer of 1945. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/cannes-scarlett-johannson-making-directing-debut-on-truman-capotes-summer-crossing/" target="_blank">http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/cann...mmer-crossing/</a><br />
<br />
I think this has potential but I'm hoping she doesn't do Affleck and insist on casting herself on a role she's not suited for and instead gets someone more age appropriate for the female lead. However, they probably want someone older than 17 so that the film plays older and like an adult prestige fare instead of like a YA adaptation. Period dramas can be quite expensive so I'd expect them to try to get someone with a good name recognition - basically Watson, Stone, Stewart, Lawrence or Woodley. While the novel went unpublished, I'd assume quite a few actresses would want to do Capote adaptation if their schedule allows them to.<br />
<br />
The shooting will begin next year. ( Considering the fact that Avengers we'll be filming in the spring and the rumors that Scarlett has threatened to quit if she doesn't get a raise, we might have Black Widow-less Avengers 2.)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://awardsdailyforums.com/forumdisplay.php?2-FILM-news">FILM::news</category>
			<dc:creator>Cecilia</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://awardsdailyforums.com/showthread.php?33059-Scarlett-Johansson-directing-Truman-Capote-s-unpublished-Summer-Crossing</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
